We can discern a 6,000-year milestone in human history from the Bible. In other words, humanity has been given crucial hints regarding the Second Coming, and it is clear that the time limit is fast approaching. Furthermore, when examining the original biblical languages, the fact that specific years emerge is undeniable. Despite this, many people still reflexively brandish the same verse: "No one knows the day or the hour, not even the Son, but only the Father."
Some people approach me with hostility, asking, "What are you going to do if the timing for the Second Coming is wrong?" Here are my direct thoughts on that matter.
If it misses the mark, the only logical explanation would be some form of historical calendar manipulation, which is a possibility anyone should be able to figure out for themselves. The reason people demand to know "what I'll do" is likely because they internally recognize the theoretical truth in this and feel they've reached a point of no return. If they truly thought this was just a groundless academic fantasy beyond debate, they wouldn't give it a second look, let alone feel compelled to verify its validity. Instead of offering a word of gratitude or appreciation for the work of polishing and publishing the legacies of great Christian predecessors free of charge, jumping straight to condemnation makes one little more than a "monster claimant." Since Daniel and Revelation contain information hinting at the timing of the Return—such as the 1,260 days or 'three and a half times'—it stands to reason that the end times of the 21st century are handled differently than they were two thousand years ago. I ask that people abandon this "information-leech" mindset and stop pushing their rude demands onto me. I am not God; I can only infer based on available circumstantial evidence, and the theory itself is consistent.
This is my stance.
Unlike cults such as the Unification Church, Jehovah’s Witnesses, or Mormons, I am not specifying the exact "day and hour" or threatening people to "hand over all their money." I believe every individual is responsible for their own way of life before God. As it is written, no one can be the master of another’s faith. What reason is there for me to dictate how those who disagree with my view should think? Furthermore, the Bible clearly implies the 6,000th year of human history. Once you know this, if you don't proclaim it, wouldn't you be labeled a "wicked and lazy servant" who failed to use their talents?
Recently, the term "Gen Z" has emerged, and young people of the Reiwa era are often criticized for having a "victim mentality" or "other-blaming" (taseki-shiko) mindset. Curiously, it seems there are many in the Christian community who share this dependency, asking "what if you're wrong?" For example, frustrated women might treat Jesus like a boyfriend to indulge in romantic delusions, while ego-driven men get intoxicated by their own "exclusive salvation" through a hyper-masculine vibe, seeking to stand out by spreading childish doctrines.
These "other-blaming" and greedy individuals tend to seek out charismatic leaders, a tendency that is closely linked to the Mark of the Beast.
According to the Bible, we are living in the 6,000th year of human history. Even searching in English, there doesn't seem to be another site or blog that provides such meticulous commentary based on the original languages. Instead of taking the benefits of an interconnected society for granted, why not try learning from this work without disregarding the sincerity with which I approach it?
Please refrain from the childish, "other-blaming" heckling of "What if you're wrong?" and instead provide feedback from a fresh perspective.
No comments:
Post a Comment